Thursday, 24 November 2016

Horror and Location

Unsurprising as it may seem, location has a colossal effect on horror. Whether it is the use of the vampire’s gothic castle, or the cramped city overrun by the zombie horde, location is paramount to how we perceive it. While also being undeniably linked to atmosphere, which is incredibly useful when applied to location because it ‘is created by anything that suggests an ominous state of affairs beyond what our senses perceive and our minds can fully comprehend’ (Ligotti, 185).
Location in horror can be accentuated very much by the atmosphere created by authors and cinematographers (which often uses pathetic fallacy) especially those ‘saturated by isolation and seclusion’ (Beville, 155). This can be shown in many ways through the different mediums open to horror and the use of enforced or deliberate isolation is common when used in conjunction with its many sub-genres. Especially the subgenres of body horror, slasher fiction, supernatural fiction, and fiction involving humanoid monsters such as vampires and werewolves.
Isolation is used by these sub-genres in slightly different ways, in body horror, isolation is often coupled with physical restraint. For instance, in the ‘Saw’ franchise, in the task involving the reverse bear trap, the horror is created by the count down towards the victim’s ultimate failure is heightened by her bondage and utter isolation within the location depicted in the film.
In slasher fiction the setting is often a house or some other teen-related setting, such as a summer camp in the woods, somewhere the characters can be easily separated and the attacker can cut off the character’s only means of escape or chase them through a dark forest, like in 'Friday the 13th'. Leaving the audience with the knowledge that even if the character does escape, their impending doom is almost inevitable.
In supernatural fiction there seems to be a more natural element to the isolation, as if nature itself wants to prevent the protagonist from escaping, mists obscure the path and ‘when the tide came in, it would be quite submerged and untraceable’ (Hill, 68). Fiction involving humanoid monsters generally uses the isolation of individuals or small communities where the actions of the monster can go largely unnoticed by the outside world.
Isolation can also be used to heighten the tensions and paranoia between the characters. For example, in John Carpenter's film ‘The Thing’, the paranoia felt by the crew is heightened by that same sense of loneliness as they are left in the ‘open plains and mountains’ (Beville, 155). They don’t know, out of the few people left, who the Thing has taken over.
Stephen King sums up the true nature of isolation very well in his novel ‘’Salem’s Lot’:
“Alone. Yes, that's the key word, the most awful word in the English tongue. Murder doesn't hold a candle to it and hell is only a poor synonym.” (King, 289)
With sub-genres like horde fiction and non-humanoid monsters it is generally cities and larger communities that come under threat, possibly even humanity. This is the case with books like ‘I Am Legend’ by Richard Matheson, in which the vampires take over the world as Neville knows it, and the ‘Godzilla’ franchise which sets the attacks against many different cities, from Tokyo to New York to Honolulu.
However, even within some of these stories there is the same sense of solitude running through them. Some films will isolate extras that may have no relevance to the overall plotline and portray them dying, regardless of whether or not the audience feels for them. However it just accentuates how, even in a crowded place, death is faced alone.

Endnotes

  1. Thomas Ligotti, The conspiracy against the Human Race (New York: Hippocampus Press, 2010), 185.
  2. Maria Beville, The Unnameable Monster in Literature and Film (New York: Routeledge, 2014), 155.
  3. Susan Hill, The Woman in Black, (Great Britain: Hamish Hamilton, 1983), 68.
  4. Stephen King, ‘Salem’s Lot (London: Hodder, 2006), 289.

The Nature of Horror

“The 3 types of terror: The Gross-out: the sight of a severed head tumbling down a flight of stairs, it's when the lights go out and something green and slimy splatters against your arm. The Horror: the unnatural, spiders the size of bears, the dead waking up and walking around, it's when the lights go out and something with claws grabs you by the arm. And the last and worse one: Terror, when you come home and notice everything you own had been taken away and replaced by an exact substitute. It's when the lights go out and you feel something behind you, you hear it, you feel its breath against your ear, but when you turn around, there's nothing there...” – Stephen King 
           For centuries before literacy was common among the populace, preachers taught fire and damnation, demons and devils from pulpits across the Christian world, scaring the people away from chaos and sin and. Yet the ‘God that we have created and allowed to shape our culture through, […] is a pretty villainous creature’ (Clive Barker). After all, though Lucifer tempts man, he is not often depicted as punishing them, who is? Why, God. Who created Hell and ‘the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels’ (Matthew, 25:41) when judgement day comes? Not Lucifer. Nevertheless, the fear of a being that killed less than a dozen people was rampant enough to control droves of people for millennia. Which may possibly be why the subversion of religious good is such a popular motif in fiction today.
Just saying....
           The nature of horror as we perceive it now is a rather different beast, formed through many eras of literary history. However, the introduction of the Gothic in the Romantic period really paved the way for the genre split we now recognise as Horror fiction. Which in turn has split into its many sub-genres across various media.
One almost universal aspect of the nature of horror is its links to sexuality, from the Gothic horror novel ‘Dracula’ where Jonathan desires the brides to ‘kiss [him] with those red lips’ (Stoker, 36) to the sex scene in ‘American Psycho’ where the prostitute wakes up only to be chased with a chainsaw. This is because the physiological reactions that are stimulated by the arousal of fear and lust are the same. Some examples being a quickened heart rate, dilated pupils and sweaty palms. This is the reasoning behind why so many slasher films show teens who are about to, have just finished or are having sex, get slaughtered, it heightens the impact of the arousal of fear, for example, in ‘Scream’
This could either be seen as a clever psychological trick on the part of the cinematographers or a cheap cop-out so they don’t have to work on building up so much tension. In comparison, ‘The Grudge’ only ever insinuates sex at the beginning, and instead spends the entire movie building tension, all the while the audience is not quite sure of what’s going on, which is just as effective. This is the difference between stereotypical horror and psychological horror films, while horror authors can use these techniques, while also using the two described below.
Gore is very useful in horror to disgust or thrill the audience, however, if overused it can lose its power and shock value if there is no real story to carry it. It’s the difference between the carefully plotted ‘Texas Chainsaw Massacre’[1974] and the pile of dead deer carcasses that was ‘House Of Wax’[2005].
I'm not just being mean, this is actually from the movie...
Yet there is another side to horror, which has nothing to do with the out and out disgust for blood, guts and gore. Rather it focuses on the subtler side to horror, the creepy; the wrong, ‘The uncanny’. Rather than have the fear startle and shock you with jumpscares, it creeps into your brain like ‘the Overlook’ (King, 96) creeps into Jack Torrance’s. The theory of the ‘uncanny valley’ is very prevalent in this, there are many stories where creatures are humanoid, but they have no face, or no eyes, or a grin wider that it should be and, if we're honest, that's scary. However there is still an ‘active debate as to whether the uncanny valley exists at all’ or whether humanity is just creeped out by things that aren’t ‘quite human’.

Endnotes
Stephen King, The Shining, (Great Britain: Hoddor and Stoughton, 1977), 96.
 

Horror and the Writer

“[Horror fiction] shows us that the control we believe we have is purely illusory, and that every moment we teeter on chaos and oblivion.” ― Clive Barker
Writing horror effectively uses many different elements and can factor in much more than I can fit in a blog post, while also depending on the style and sub-genre the author uses.
Description is one of the most important factors in horror writing because it conveys location, character, and whatever that thing is that’s coming up behind you. However, description is a tricky beast as if you don’t have enough, you don’t get a proper sense of the world, too much and you can lose pacing and tension. H.P. Lovecraft describes the monsters in ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth’ as ‘a disturbing suggestion of undulant motion’ (Lovecraft, 546) which still conjures up fearful images in the reader’s mind, despite the fact it was published in, whereas, if he had described them as ‘fish-people’ (which is what they are), it would be a lot less effective. The concept of the almost indescribable and un-described in Lovecraft’s work is characteristic and keeps me coming back because of the chills it gives me on the back of my neck. 
Isolation of characters is already a very prominent technique in the horror genre as a whole, for example, I feel one of the reasons King’s first novel ‘Carrie’ is so effective is because on top of the character being so completely socially isolated from her peers, King also taps into the very real isolation a girl feels when starting her menstrual cycle for the first time ‘she thought she was bleeding to death’ (King, 18). While, in terms of physical isolation, ‘The Shining’ is a better example because of the expanse of setting which contains only three characters, but also the effect of cabin fever between them making it feel much more cramped than it is.

King states in his book ‘Danse Macabre’,
‘All tales of horror can be divided into two groups: those in which the horror results from an act of free and conscious will – a conscious decision to do evil – and those in which the horror is predestinate, coming from outside like a stroke of lightning.’ 
While this is true for some stories, I don’t feel it can be applied to every story, for instance, though the evil being may come from outside the protagonist’s knowledge and experience, they could have been there for generations before the protagonist’s birth, like the concept of Cthulhu and the Old Ones from H.P. Lovecraft’s work. 
Empathy with the protagonist (who is generally a victim of horror) is crucial as, without this, the story simply hasn’t got a leg to stand on because the audience will not care what happens to them. However, sometimes it is not as clear-cut who is the victim and who is the villain, for example, Jack Torrance is equally a victim of himself and the Overlook’s power. Equally, some of his actions before his behaviour was influenced by the hotel point to him being not a very nice person, or even abusive 'he's losing his temper' (King, 136) and because if this blurred line between villain and victim, we empathise with and feel sorry for Jack while also fearing him. Therefore the use of an unreliable narrator is another way that the writer can use characterisation in horror.
‘Inevitably the narrator makes a strong appeal to the reader’s sympathy and empathy, and the reader begins to respond privately…once the reader feels the slightest identification with the narrator the bond is complete. Whatever anguish or despair the narrator suffers in the tale, the reader also suffers.’ - David R. Saliba, A Psychology of Fear.
While all of these choices and aspects involved in horror make it the amazing, heart-chilling genre it is, it's really how the author chooses to use and mould them to their story that makes it truly effective.


Endnotes

  1. H.P. Lovecraft, Necronomicon, (Great Britain: Gollancz, 2008), p.546.
  2. Stephen King, Carrie, (Great Britain: Hodder and Stoughton, 1974), p.18.
  3. Stephen King, The Shining, (Great Britain: Hodder and Stoughton, 1977), p.136.

Wednesday, 23 November 2016

Horror and Me (Caution: Trigger Warning)

Horror and I have been dancing cheek to cheek since birth, if I were not scared, I was scaring someone else. Whether purposefully or accidental. Yet my horrors were rarely self-created, due to the prolific bullying I endured throughout my childhood and teenage years. Or if I did create them, they were much more rational than the average childhood night-terror. 
Not to say that I never experienced the imagined monsters, mainly the eyes in the knots in the wood of my door, the alligator on the floor of my room, the giant floating head in the hallway between my room and my parents’ and others that I cannot quite recall. It wasn’t that they didn’t terrify me at the time; I just found that real people were scarier than what I imagined. To the point where I had a real-life experience with the paranormal and I felt no fear at all, despite all the horror I’d watched and read, condemning ghosts as things of evil. 
One thing I have a real fear of is not being in control of myself, this fear has greatly impacted, and still affects my behaviour. I have refused to drink alcohol or take drugs due to their mind and perception-altering properties, thus making it easier for people to take advantage of me. This fear also applies to manipulation in other forms, especially psychological manipulation associated with abuse or charisma. However, considering society today, I am the most scared of physical manipulation and a ‘lack of control’ (Saliba, 39). I am especially scared of rape, I can watch horror films depicting brutal slayings but the second there is some sort of sexual assault. I cannot stand it.
Scene from 'The Last House On The Left' 2013
It is not only being raped that I am afraid of. I am afraid of the rape culture that our society has, people say that a girl is ‘asking for it’ if she’s wearing something deemed promiscuous, or even if she isn’t. Words cannot say how afraid it makes me when men leer at me, even in places that are deemed ‘safer’ for girls to go, like gay bars. Even there, there are still men who slip their arms around your waist, then get offended when you get scared. I’m not excluding women from people who can commit sexual assault or harassment, it’s just that I personally have never been harassed by women. 
I just know the facts: I’m small, I’m not physically as strong as a man, and I have no desire for this to happen to me or anyone. That is why I carry my keys in my hand when I have no choice but to walk home alone, as the winter nights draw in and everything turns to streetlight and shadows because the facts that ‘approximately 85,000 women are raped on average in England and Wales every year. Over 400,000 women are sexually assaulted each year. One in 5 women (aged 16 – 59) has experienced some form of sexual violence since the age of 16’ are the scariest things to me.
It may be because of these experiences and fears that the genre I am most comfortable writing in, is the genre of terror, the horror and the gothic. Using how I very much feared being caught by the bullies when I was younger and how I fear rape now, as fuel for stories. 

Endnotes 

  1. David R. Saliba, A Psychology of Fear (Washington D.C: University Press of America, 1980), 39.
  2. Ejaz Khan, http://katehon.com/389-top-10-countries-with-highest-rape-crime.html (accessed 21st November, 2016).